[Wii] Super Paper Mario - "An Unrivaled Battle" by King Sammer

[King Sammer]

I have fixed it!

[Bespinben]

I think in this process you've learned a lot King Sammer. I admire that. In some cases though, I think having some kind of model to see what you're sheets could/should be is helpful. Because of that, I decided to reformat your sheet myself. Don't worry, I didn't really change the notes - just the way they were presented. I hope this will help you to know what to expect when we say "this could use some more dynamics and articulation".

[MUS] [MIDI] [PDF]

(Don't worry - you don't have to do pictures lol)
(I do recommend composing endings if you have ideas for them though)

[King Sammer]

I think in this process you've learned a lot King Sammer. I admire that. In some cases though, I think having some kind of model to see what you're sheets could/should be is helpful. Because of that, I decided to reformat your sheet myself. Don't worry, I didn't really change the notes - just the way they were presented. I hope this will help you to know what to expect when we say "this could use some more dynamics and articulation".

[MUS] [MIDI] [PDF]

(Don't worry - you don't have to do pictures lol)
(I do recommend composing endings if you have ideas for them though)

Should I credit you for this?

[King Sammer]

Can I just keep the old ones? Please?

[Bespinben]

Of course you can still work on your old sheet! What I'm showing you is a model, and that it doesn't have to be exactly like mine. I just expect you to see that there are still things that can (and should) be fine-tuned in your sheet. Some of the big issues include:

1.) No tempo marking (thus the "vicace con brio" in mine)
2.) Transcription errors (measure 1, the intro, just has one voice, not two; beat 4 of every measure in the right hand is 2 eighths, not 2 sixteenths + an eighth; the bass lines comes in immediately at measure 2, not at measure 6)
3.) Efficiency of notation (you wrote mf, then f, then ff, then f -- that's what crescendos and decrescendos are for!)(measure 6-9 identical to m. 10-13, therefore a repeat sign could accommodate that)

At the heart of the matter, I just don't want you settling for mediocre work King Sammer. Don't ask "is it good enough for you now?", but ask yourself "what more can I improve upon?"

[King Sammer]

How do I edit the music note thing? I want to make it 130 but it reads 100 and I can't edit it

[King Sammer]

How do I edit the music note thing? I want to make it 130 but it reads 100 and I can't edit it

[King Sammer]

Never mind, I fixed it!

[Bespinben]

2.) Transcription errors
(measure 1, the intro, just has one voice, not two;
beat 4 of every measure in the right hand is 2 eighths, not 2 sixteenths + an eighth)

3.) Efficiency of notation (you wrote mf, then f, then ff, then f -- that's what crescendos and decrescendos are for!)
(measure 6-9 identical to m. 10-13, therefore a repeat sign could accommodate that)

^^^^^^^^^^^
you fixed two things, but not the rest of them

And about the repeat sign -- yes you put one in, but not in the most efficient way. If you want separate dynamics for m. 6-9 vs. 10-13 even though they're identical, just write in "mf 1st time; f 2nd time" or something like that.

[Xaoz]

^^^^^^^^^^^
you fixed two things, but not the rest of them

And about the repeat sign -- yes you put one in, but not in the most efficient way. If you want separate dynamics for m. 6-9 vs. 10-13 even though they're identical, just write in "mf 1st time; f 2nd time" or something like that.

Please stop. You already messed up Sammer's sheet before. Do you even know what an octave is?!

[Bespinben]

Hmm.... octave? you mean like that one Roman military commander dude?

[Bloop]

heh i get it

[mikey]

You must be thinking of Antony

[King Sammer]

I think it should be accepted already.

[King Sammer]

Accepted?