Religion

[FireArrow]

The problem is that not all evolutionists are atheists and not all atheists are evolutionists. 

Eh, while it true that supporting evolutionary theory isn't included in the definition of atheism, if you don't belong to a faith there's a 99% chance you're an evolutionist. It's by far one of the most agreed upon and foundational theories of biology.

Though yeah, assuming someone is an atheist because they support evolution is wrong. I just did it for comical effect.

[Tobbeh99]

you silly atheist

Don't think it's that simple that matter+light+heat=new life. If that was the case then we would find new life everywhere. One thing that video doesn't mention is that for new life to happen there needs to be a specific environment suitable for the organism. But sometimes that might happen just like in the video, if you have certain groceries outside the fridge some might start to mold, which is life. 

[FireArrow]

Don't think it's that simple that matter+light+heat=new life. If that was the case then we would find new life everywhere. One thing that video doesn't mention is that for new life to happen there needs to be a specific environment suitable for the organism. But sometimes that might happen just like in the video, if you have certain groceries outside the fridge some might start to mold, which is life.

"matter + heat + energy = new life" has absolutely nothing to do with evolution.

EDIT: After googling biogenisis a bit (what I'm assuming the video is mistakenly confusing with evolution?) one of the more solid theories is that electrical activity (lightning strikes) along with specific chemicals can result in amino acids and sugars (this is proven, as to whether or not it happened and life came from it is what's debated.)

[SuperFireKirby]

Yes, that is one of the more popular theories on life's origin. But there's a bunch of them and none are much more than pure speculation.

[Pianist Da Sootopolis]

So can someone explain to me the religious connection to denying climate change?

[FireArrow]

It has nothing to do with religious; a better question would be "Can someone explain to me the political connection to denying climate change." Religious people are just much more likely to be "anti-science" (why is that even considered a thing?) along with often conforming to conservative views.

[Ruto]

It's a difference of what they see as the role of humans.

If you're Pope Francis:
1) Humans are supposed to take care of creation.

If you're Ken Ham:
2) Everything in the world is given to humans to use so use it all and nothing can go wrong because Bible.

If you're Ken Ham, read about how people mine for metals/oil and you'll see why he's stupid as hell. Inorganic chemistry I and personal responsibility fall on deaf ears to this guy.

Did anyone notice wariopiano deleted his account or got banned? Is it the shame or what?

[JDMEK5]

if you have certain groceries outside the fridge some might start to mold, which is life.

Careful, Pasteur disproved that a long time ago.

[Yellow]

You should believe that your experiences and memories aren't as reliable as we make them out to be.

[FireArrow]

^I think scientists have proven false memories not only exist, but are pretty common. Kinda freaks me out.

[Waddle Bro]

"Should believe" is a phrase i'm not comfortable with because there is nothing someone should believe in

[FireArrow]

"You should believe that murder is bad."

[Yellow]

You should believe in yourself! I do!

[mastersuperfan]

"Should believe" is a phrase i'm not comfortable with because there is nothing someone should believe in

...Should I believe in your philosophy on believing?

[Waddle Bro]

No in contrary, you should question me, like all beliefs. Beliefs are questionable. I'm not here to make you to think like me, I'm just trying to encourage you to think critically.