And there we go. Moved the decrescendo and mf a bit, and now it all fits.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: mastersuperfan on September 09, 2018, 08:32:49 PMWell, there is thisI mean, isn't that sheet years old anyhow?
https://www.ninsheetmusic.org/download/pdf/3575
Quote from: Latios212 on August 06, 2018, 04:14:36 PMYou could also just make this sheet one system instead of stretching everything out.This song is so short that I'd want to have 2 systems in it so at least a bit of the paper is used.
Quote from: Latios212 on August 05, 2018, 12:51:28 PM- I think there shouldn't be any ties in the left hand. It sounds to me like the notes are re-struck at the beginning of the respective measures.I probably wouldn't have realized that was a thing, changing the note durations. Also, I think the whole note being restuck thing is probably just a part of the audio and instrumentation more than them actually being struck. That, and if they're restruck, it doesn't sound as good.
- You may want to consider halving both the tempo and note durations - a tempo marking of 140 implies a brisk pace as opposed to the relaxed sound of the original. You won't have to rewrite anything - you can just highlight everything, select Utilities > Change Note Durations, and set it to 50%.
Quote from: Olimar12345 on August 05, 2018, 01:22:37 PMAlso maybe lower the first system and composer/arrangers a tad? (since you have the space) In the formatting guidelines the image clearly shows those fields below the subtitle, whereas yours are in-line with them. Try to make it more like that when applicable.Done! uwu
Quote from: Olimar12345 on August 05, 2018, 12:04:41 PMYou have all of the right notes, just written in weird octaves. I'd remove all 8vas since they aren't needed anywhere in this sheet, then transpose everything up to their correct octave. After that, move the LH up another octave since that is how it plays in the recording. I'd put it in treble clef too.Well, I did it. Is this better?
Quote from: Sebastian on July 18, 2018, 06:56:24 PM- Go ahead and remove the "s" in "https" from the copyright info.Hm, dunno why the composer/arranger lines keep getting misaligned, even if I make sure that they're aligned beforehand. Also, if I remember, doesn't https work fine?
- The composer/arranger names are a bit misaligned. Right-align those.
Quote from: InsigTurtle on July 24, 2018, 01:54:39 AMOnly issue I'm noticing is beat 1.5 of m.3, that E is pretty difficult for a regular piano player to hit with the A. In m.1, it's fine because you have the LH to help out, but here it's not too easy unless you pedal to keep the B in the bass going. So you should try to add an indication to a performer so they know how exactly they should play that (unless you want them to decide for themselves, in which case the current version is fine)I'll leave it blank, since it could be that, they could just reach, left hand or right hand. There's probably more possibilities that's slipping from my mind, even.
Quote from: nacho2420 on July 14, 2018, 03:55:43 AMSorry, meant measure 5 not 3Well, either way, measure 5 is now fixed.
Quote from: nacho2420 on June 28, 2018, 08:12:28 PMTimpani notes should be C#, A, consecutively, from what I hearThank you, I've changed the pitches, however, I don't know what you mean by your second comment?
Meas. 3, check you have the right notes on beat 2; there aren't to A's but A, D
Page created in 0.100 seconds with 16 queries.