Introducing the new sorting feature on the front page! Sort through sheets alphabetically or chronologically!
Neat.Now, the more important part...Congratulations to our two runner-ups, Latias121 and Yug_Gal, having tied on my quiz for the fourth time in a row, each with a score of 9/25!
...Is it just me, or does something feel a little off here...?[close]
And thank you Yug Guy for the sheet! ^^No, thank you for playing it! You did a fantastic job!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT THAT IMAGE IT GETS ME EVERY TIME
Last two things. Promise.Pinky swear?
Regarding those dyads in m25-38, I think the best option there would be to move most of them up one chord tone. For example, in m25-26, make the dyads B-D instead of G-B. This way you can get more notes of the chord instead of just the root and 3rd. Plus, it has a more full sound and is a lot easier to play instead of constantly rolling large intervals.I've changed all the G-B dyads to B-D dyads. The rest of the dyads are close enough that I didn't think I needed to mess around with them at all. Files updated.
I believe there was a communication error on my part. Sorry! M. 17-24 doesn't need the LH. I didn't clarify that. My bad.Alright, thanks for letting me know.
Originally, I was talking about M. 25-38 (the dyads); however, I believe the right hand can play the dyads and melody since they don't exceed a tenth interval. Most of the time, tenths are fine in sheets on NSM, especially "minor tenths" (M. 25, for example). You could put rolls in, but anyone playing them with hands small enough that they are unable to reach them would roll them anyway.
I just want to mention that a tenth between a white and a black key is significantly more difficult than a tenth between two white keys--and a ninth between two white keys is still very difficult if there's a black key in the middle. Feel free to leave it as it is now, but I would imagine that, more often than not, the pianist would have to roll some of these chords. If you'd prefer that over using the left hand, then the notation you have right now is fine.Yeah, I prefer the way I have it now. But thanks for the suggestion(s)!
I know, but it's probably fine just the way it is right now.
- While it's most certainly already implied, a "con pedale" marking wouldn't hurt. Not required, though.
I get it, but I've already gone through and changed it at an updater's request, and I really don't want to have to change it back again. Updaters, can we please get a consensus on what needs to be done here?
- I don't imagine that you would need the left hand to play those whole notes in m17-23, so you could probably revert those ones to how you had it originally.
- One last thought: the "L.H." notation is a little vague, since it's hard to tell whether the left hand should be playing just the bottom note, or the whole chord, etc. I wonder if it would be helpful to insert brackets in between the notes of the chords to specify which notes specifically should be played by the L.H, because playing the whole chord with the L.H. every time isn't very convenient. At the same time, though, the notes are pretty close together, and that might end up messy-looking, and the pianist would probably be able to figure out how they would best play it by themselves. Just an idea for consideration, but nothing necessary.
Updated on my own personal copy - I'll update the OP with these changes once we get everything else settled.
- Very nitpicky, but the tempo is closer to 104 BPM than 105 (it's about a 104.3, actually).
- Another small nitpick: the "mp" marking in m40 is touching the bar line; I think it'd look a little cleaner if you moved it to the right a bit.
