News:

See you space cowboy...

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - cashwarrior1

#1
Always a learning process! Also, to alleviate your concerns about plagiarism, Static's arrangement of Flight Club was completed in 2017 and shared on their arrangement thread.
#2
wow, this is so cool!!
#3
The submissions channel on discord is for discussion of submissions, usually used to ask clarification on something on the forums, but all site submissions go through the forums.
#4
based route theme

two little things i noticed

  • m2/20 LH b4 is an Fn (instead of G). I also hear that note repeated on b4.5
  • m14-15 the RH triplets outline the chords a little, so b1.67 would be F, b2.67 A, (m15)b1.67 E, b2.67 A(?). It'd also be easier to play than repeating the same note

Also thoughts on including the inner harmonies for m4? (that's my favorite part)
#5
Forum Games / Re: Whoevers post last wins. New rule.
April 11, 2024, 06:10:09 PM
wb
#6
So this video calls the track "Princess Zelda" but gamerips label it as "Zelda's Lullaby." I couldn't find an official track list, so I'm going based on the gamerip.


also holy crap this sheet is 3 years old 😭
#7
HAPPY BIRTHDAY
#8
What the heck??? This exists???
#9
Quote from: Latios212 on April 07, 2024, 09:06:18 AMFinal check incoming! I don't remember this track at all... but it's a really cool piece. Some of these chord changes oh page 2 are strikingly similar to Land of Morytha from 2. It's cool how the melody from the beginning is reharmonized on page 3...
It's probably my favorite "cutscene" track, along with Majesty (which should've been used more imo).

Quote from: Latios212 on April 07, 2024, 09:06:18 AM- The LH slurs in m. 10-11 are a bit exaggerated
They sure are o.O

Quote from: Latios212 on April 07, 2024, 09:06:18 AMI think this is actually easiest to read the way it originally was, with Fn and Ab instead of E# and G#. You would lose the proper spelling of the C# major chord in the middle but it's just passing here. Having the Dn-E# interval in the other chords that do represent the harmony of the measure seems much more awkward to me than the C#-Fn-Ab-C# stack.
I have no preference for either, they're both chord spellings I'd have to stare at for a while 🙃

Updated.
#10
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 04, 2024, 06:22:16 AMI hear the notes as you have them, except I don't think I hear the C in the RH m19 of Low Altitude.
That one is there more to make it feel more full, but I did listen again and I do hear a C (and a G) above the G the sax plays. I moved the C an octave higher instead.

Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 04, 2024, 06:22:16 AM
  • In general for low gravity I think spreading this across 5 systems or more would be best, as the space is quite cramped at the moment. Your call though
    Also, I understand what you were going for with shortening the stems of the high Fs like in m7 of low gravity, but to me it looks a little off. If you spread this sheet wider then you won't need the shortening, but if not then maybe another updater can offer some insight
So I was struggling to find out how to spread this one out, since I wanted to keep it all on one page. I figured that since there's the measures with fermatas, I could probably just make those really small to allow for more space. I've left it as is more-so because moving things would mean I have to re-adjust the notes and ties and everything for each measure again 🙃.
Also, the short stem was Finale's choice (probably because it's written in the LH) so I just made them longer.

Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 04, 2024, 06:22:16 AM
  • In m1 of low altitude, you have a repeat barline, but not in m1 of low gravity. I'd recommend not using any but whatever you choose it should be consistent
True, repeats are kinda useless here.

Updated.
#11
Quote from: Bloop on March 31, 2024, 12:42:09 PMMaybe it's easier to try and hear the L.H. C# in m33 jump up a minor third to the E in m34? I mostly mentioned it because it was the bass note, which changes the inversion and thus slightly changes the feel of the chord. The Em for example sounds a bit less grounded without the E below.
Ohhhh okay yeah that helps lmao

Quote from: Bloop on March 31, 2024, 12:42:09 PMI figured that was what you were going for yeah, but I figured that if the L.H. restrikes on the last bar, it gives the same effect of an actual resolution. So in other words, a softer 1-note resolution in m68 beat 3 (which is the harp), and a stronger full chord resolution in m69 (which is the rebowed strings + string melody). If you still prefer keeping it as is though, that's fine too, because I do agree it distracts a bit from the main melody ^^
Ah, the restriking does help make the resolution stronger. I think what I'll do is put the harp B as a separate voice so it shows that you need to keep holding the C# and the performer can play that note softer.

Updated.
#12
Quote from: Bloop on March 31, 2024, 11:17:17 AM-m16: I hear Dn instead of D# on beat 3.5 in the R.H.
Those strings are playing a pretty sharp Dn then 😭 (though I hear it now)

Quote from: Bloop on March 31, 2024, 11:17:17 AM-m34 and 35: I hear an E in the cello (and piano in m35) which could go in the L.H.
I'm having trouble understanding what you mean by this. The C in m34 is quite strong and so I'm having trouble making picking out a distinct E, however, I do have an E played in the RH already so would another one be necessary? (And m35 has two different Es)

Quote from: Bloop on March 31, 2024, 11:17:17 AM-m68-69: The harp (annoyingly) already goes to the B in beat 3 of m68, but it kinda sounds like the other strings also rebow at m69, so maybe that helps finishing off the piece like this:
You cannot view this attachment.
So that harp resolution I had chose to ignore (and thought I had mentioned it here but I checked and I didn't, oops) because I feel that in the original, the different instruments make that early resolution more palatable, but on piano it just feels like a distraction from the string melody. I didn't include that change here, but if people insist then I'll make the change. (I did remove the tied notes, though)

Updated.
#13
Okay okay, that makes sense. I removed the courtesies on m28 since the key signature being right next to it makes sense to me lol.

Quote from: Latios212 on March 17, 2024, 05:39:58 PMOne thing though, it looks like you've missed the Gn in m. 5 beat 1.
oop
#14
Quote from: goldenscruff on March 10, 2024, 12:20:23 AMm10 Ab should be G#. Even though it's descending chromatic motion, everything around here is naturals or sharps.
It seems that I forgot to update the PDF, as this was fixed in the musx file, oop.

Quote from: goldenscruff on March 10, 2024, 12:20:23 AMm21 is missing courtesy accidental in LH

m28 should have courtesy accidentals on Gn
So I'm a little unsure how many courtesy accidentals I should put in sections like this. Like should I be putting one on the F# and C# or is just the first beat fine? I've had a streamer sight read it and he didn't have much confusion about it so I'm assuming just having one thing is fine.

Quote from: goldenscruff on March 10, 2024, 12:20:23 AMm62 I hear this bar as a Gmaj7. Maybe change b2.0 and  maybe 4.0 to F# in LH.
I change the LH arpeggio so that only the first and last note plays G, the rest of the Gs I moved down to F#

Quote from: goldenscruff on March 10, 2024, 12:20:23 AMm67 I hear F# in the cello/viola not E
I'm hearing a middle voice go D (m66) - E. I added the F# and kept the E

Updated.
#15
Forum Games / Re: Whoevers post last wins. New rule.
March 13, 2024, 07:04:19 PM
mwahahahaha, i bet you thought you were gonna win, didn't you?? >:)