NSM Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  


Spotted an error on the main site? Let us know!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Altissimo

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 139
point taken, i just figured i'd get permission ahead of time in case i DID use them :B thanks!!

I should clarify I'm probably only going to be focusing on Mystery Dungeon 1 and 2

(This double post is here so it doesn't get lost in the previous post!)

hey ben!

so i think i've mentioned this elsewhere on the forum but i'm thinking about making my topic for my graduate thesis the music of mystery dungeon. Would it be all right if I cited your arrangements in the paper if I needed to? Specifically...
1) Can I cite your arrangements from the NSM website?
2) Can I cite arrangements that are in the thread but NOT on the NSM website?
3) Are there any arrangements that you'd rather I DIDN'T use? (I'm not talking ones that you think you could have done a better job on, because for the purpose of my thesis that's not as big of an issue as whether or not the arrangements are at least accurate. So, I'm asking if there are any sheets you think are inaccurate and you'd rather I didn't use.)

This goes for any Mystery Dungeon arranger who sees this, but Ben is the most prominent one so that's why I'm asking here lol.

I'd love it if you could respond quickly, because if the answer is no that means I need to start working on completing my own arrangements!!

Hey, welcome to NSM, Slush! Why don't you get a Skype account so we can go about formatting your sheet? If you haven't noticed, and no offense by this, your sheet isn't exactly up-to-standards for this site. My Skype is simply my username: LeviR.star. Don't leave us; we can help you! I've got just the template file for you to use!

i hate to be contradictory but why a skype account?? i mean this forum exists for a reason and that reason is for people to interact with one another WITHOUT skype, i mean it seems kinda ridiculous to me to say "hey lets not use the public forum and instead I want you to go out of your way to use something you might not otherwise be using to talk about arranging" just... let it happen in the thread

Nintendo / Re: Kirby for the SWITCH!!
« on: June 13, 2017, 06:56:04 PM »
I think that the physics in Dream Land 3 were even more irritating. Even while running, you would move super slow, and flying feels awkward.

I definitely understand that, but to me it seemed more fitting of a more slow-paced, puzzle based game like KDL3 was.

I didn't care much for the "colored pencil" graphics. Kirby's pink was never right on the SNES.

Aww, I disagree, I thought KDL3 had one of the best art styles of any Kirby game! But again I get why you think that haha.

I agree on 64 being a general improvement, though, although it didn't do much to fix the slow pace of the game and Kirby's movement. Which worked fine for me on a 2D side scroller but was more irritating in the 64 world, idk.

I have a general soft spot for KDL3 because it's the kind of cutesy fun adventure I think Kirby was intended to be, the same reason Epic Yarn is my favorite game even though it's not a "true" Kirby game. Sometimes I just want to relax.

Nintendo / Re: Kirby for the SWITCH!!
« on: June 13, 2017, 06:27:46 PM »
I'd like to hear the argument behind this.

thanks noc...

i acknowledge it did a lot for the series but i can also acknowledge that for pokemon, diamond and pearl did a lot for the series, but they still play like ass. people seem to forget this and think innovation in mechanics automatically makes a game that much better in gameplay. diamond and pearl had one of the worst pokemon distributions ever and were slow as shit, there really isn't much that redeems them when it comes to replay value.

as far as super star goes, i can't stand the controls for one, they're different from the other kirby games and they're just ass in my opinion
also i just am not a fan of the fact that it's just a bunch of a different games because it just makes it hard to get into anything. like for example in milky way wishes the gimmick is you have to collect all the different abilities and then you can choose to use them at will but since it's such a short game i never see the point in switching abilities like at all so i just stick to fire and sword forever... like it's a cool concept but I can't bring myself to care at all when it is so short
don't like the graphics either
most of it is petty shit but whatever, i legitimately do not have a fun time when i am playing super star, and i have played every "main" kirby game except rainbow curse, and super star is by far my least favor

Off-Topic / Re: The Post Your Thoughts of the Moment Thread 2
« on: June 12, 2017, 02:40:47 PM »
book of mormon the musical

Off-Topic / Re: The Post Your Thoughts of the Moment Thread 2
« on: June 12, 2017, 04:21:48 AM »

(props if you get that reference)

- I would beam the LH parts that currently aren't (like on the first page) just for consistency with the rest of the 8th note groupings.
- A courtesy accidental would be nice to have in m20 and m28.
- You might want to either add more space above the first system on page 1 or just respace all the systems on page 1 to eliminate that empty space towards the bottom of the page.

- Not really necessary, but if you want to, you can include the 16th note dyads in some spots in place of just 8th note ones in the LH in m17-32 and m45-56 to match the guitar thing that comes in there.
Tbh I'm not really hearing where these are. I admit I haven't listened super closely but I'm just not sure what it is. (Also I think the song might be too fast for 16ths to work too well lol)

Off-Topic / Re: The Rant Thread/My Life Sucks Topic [Don't be pricks]
« on: June 11, 2017, 09:12:57 PM »
I'm at a pizza place

Off-Topic / Re: The Rant Thread/My Life Sucks Topic [Don't be pricks]
« on: June 11, 2017, 04:35:49 AM »

Nintendo / Re: Pokémon Ultra Sun & Pokémon Ultra Moon
« on: June 11, 2017, 03:41:46 AM »
tbh - controversial opinion - i dont think pokemon has ever "actually gotten better" since about gen 4 or 5 because game freak intentionally, purposefully removes helpful features from the new games in order to make the games that come out afterward seem more appealing by contrast

People say that, but gen II are objectively the most fun Pokémon games

I like how you say "objectively" as if it is some sort of undeniable fact. Are you forgetting the part where grinding is much, much, MUCH more of a chore than in any other Pokémon game, and you probably have to grind to beat Red?

The gameplay makes the game though. If you remove that, then that statement could apply to any game in the series (though there are also other factors that make certain games in particular, especially Gen 2, enjoyable).
I think you're missing the point of what I said

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 139

Page created in 0.087 seconds with 21 queries.